Legal Opinion

State v. Maack

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 2015No. CR0200769; A151852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

In 2002, defendant pleaded guilty to three felony sex crimes. He received downward departure sentences of 10 years of probation on two of those convictions and five years of probation on the third, with all of those probationary terms to be served concurrently. In 2012, the trial court revoked defendant’s probation on one of those convictions for having violated a probation condition that prohibited him from using the Internet. On appeal from the judgment revoking his probation, defendant argues that the Internet ban was an invalid probation condition and, therefore, the trial court erred…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Mix v. NewlandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. HovaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. QualeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. GalloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API