V.L. v. Wagner
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are disabled and elderly Californians who need in-home assistance with one or more of the activities of daily living, such as eating, bathing, toileting or taking medication, in order to live safely at home without risk of serious injury or harm. Plaintiffs seek to prevent the State from applying a change in the law to reduce or terminate these services to over 130,000 people who receive them from the state In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, by changing the eligibility criteria of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- M.R. v. DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cota v. Maxwell-JollyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Strouchler v. ShahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Pashby v. CanslerDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.