Legal Opinion

M.R. v. Dreyfus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2011No. 11-35026PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, Washington State Medicaid beneficiaries with severe mental and physical disabilities, appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the operation of a regulation promulgated by Washington’s Department of Social and Health Services (“DSHS”) that reduces the amount of in-home “personal care services” available under the state’s Medicaid plan. The United States Department of Justice has filed a “statement of interest” in the district court supporting Plaintiffs’ request for an injunction.

“Pe…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Samuel Lopez v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. M.R. v. DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Thorpe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API