Lee v. Transportation Communications Union
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Court is asked to determine whether an employee of the Long Island Railroad (“LIRR”) may assert pendent-party jurisdiction over a fellow employee based on state-law claims of assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress in an action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, when no independent basis of federal jurisdiction exists. For the reasons that follow, the Court declines to exercise pendent-party jurisdiction with regard to the fellow employee.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rhulen Agency, Inc. v. Alabama Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mazyck v. Long Island R. Co.(LIRR)District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Kelly v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- C.D.S. Diversified, Inc. v. Franchise Finance Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Koehler v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Mazyck v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996