Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1999No. 96 Civ. 6446(PKL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action based on an alleged assault upon her on a Metro-North Commuter Railroad (“Metro-North”) train while traveling to her job at the Metro-North office in Grand Central Terminal in New York City. Plaintiff avers claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq., and pursuant to state statutory and common law. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Metro-North moves for summary judgment as to all counts.
For the reasons stated in this Opinion,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Murphy v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Carlucci v. KalschedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Caminero v. Metropolitan Trans.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Faby v. CSX Transportation, IncDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.