Legal Opinion

Turner v. Marsh Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly overruled. The plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury.

Defendant’s principal assignment of error relates to the judge’s charge on the measure of damages. Exception was duly noted to the instruction given by the court that if the jury found the defendant made the agreement to pay the plaintiff for the device as alleged, and that it worked satisfactorily, “then the plaintiff would be entitled to recover such sum of money as would represent the value of that invention to the defendant.”

We are constrained to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County of Campbell v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Old Dominion Transportation Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
  3. Rooney v. Porter-Milton Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Ray Ex Rel. Ray v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Rothstein v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ellis Jones, Inc. v. Western Waterproofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Lake Toxaway Community Association, Inc. v. RYF Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Miles v. Carolina Forest Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Thormer v. LEXINGTON MAIL ORDER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. F.H. Hood T/A Hood Construction Co. v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API