Legal Opinion

McCraw v. Llewellyn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1962No. 671PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Plaintiff does not claim as a beneficiary under the will. He recognizes Minnie’s marriage subsequent to 30 December 1958 constituted a revocation of her will. G.S. 31-5.3; In re Will of Tenner, 248 N.C. 72, 102 S.E. 2d 391. He predicates his right to recover for breach of an express contract.

Defendant’s denial of the special contract placed the burden of proving the asserted contract on plaintiff. If he offered any evidence sufficient to support his allegation and to require compliance with the contract, he was entitled to have that issue submitted to the jury. If he failed to offer such…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Miller v. . LashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Holsz v. StephenIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Clifford v. River Bend Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Computer Decisions, Inc. v. Rouse Office Management of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Baillie Lumber Co. v. Kincaid Carolina Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API