Cvitanovich v. Bromberg
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Appanoose District Court. — Hon. 0. W. Vermilion, Judgé. Action brought by plaintiff to recover $2,700.00 for liquor alleged by him to have been sold to him by the defendant between June, 1908, and November, 193.0. The action was brought under the provisions of Sec. 2423 of the Code. There was a trial to a jury and a verdict and judgment against de- fendant for $1,500.00, from which he appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
— 1. "We have had some difficulty in determining the merits of the controversy because of the confusion in the record. Twenty-four witnesses were examined, but their names appear sixty-seven times in the abstract and two additional abstracts. Substantially all the witnesses on both sides were recalled on the trial, some of them as many as four or five times. Their evidence is abstracted in the same way and set out in different places in the abstract, and again in the same manner in the additional abstracts. Some of the corrections of the testimony in the additional abstracts do not refer to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. SterrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Sullivan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Henry v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Westercamp v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Almon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schroedl v. McTagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Vanarsdol v. FarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924