Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Burris

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 1924Published

1DissentFaville, J.

I. I cannot concur in the conclusion announced by the majority on the question of misconduct of counsel for the State. The case is of such great importance, and the conclusion of the majority is such a radical *1182departure from the former holdings of this court and many others, that I deem it not improper to state my reasons for dissenting from the pronouncement made.

I know of no more solemn and important duty that can be imposed upon this tribunal than that of determining whether or not one whose life has been adjudged to be forfeited has been tried in accordance with established rules of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. People v. MullingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API