Legal Opinion

Vanarsdol v. Farlow

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

JPlaintiff claims that, in November, 1918, the defendant, Farlow, entered into a written contract with one C. J. Beebee, selling Beebee 569 acres of land in the^ province of Saskatchewan, Canada; that said contract'was subsequently assigned by Beebee to the plaintiff, in a deal had between the plaintiff1And Beebee, in which plaintiff deeded, or caused to be deeded, an 80-acre tract of land in Harrison County, Iowa, and also executed to Beebee his promissory note for $2,250, which note was subsequently transferred to the defendant, Farlow, by Beebee. He says he was induced to make this trade…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raridan v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Sullivan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Almon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Daly v. W. W. Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Cvitanovich v. BrombergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burke v. ReiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Shuck v. KeefeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Pierce v. HeusinkveldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. State v. BevinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API