Legal Opinion

Perz v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1924No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff was injured on September 19, 1917; while riding on a miners’ train running from Bay City to the Whatcheer coal mine. The train on the day in question was still on the main line when it collided head on with a north-bound passenger train. Plaintiff claims that he was thrown across the car and injured. The damages claimed by him are for loss of time, physical injury to his person, including a hernia, and for pain and suffering. • The defendant disputes the nature and the extent of plaintiff’s injury and contends that the hernia which plaintiff claimed he sustained by the result of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cherry v. North & South RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Harmon v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Ennest v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1919
  5. Thurston v. Northern Navigation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. C. & OR CO. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API