Ennest v. Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to St. Clair; Law, J. Case by Theodore Ennest against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Defendant filed a plea in abatement, which was overruled. Defendant brings certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case comes into this court on certiorari to review the order of the trial judge overruling defendant’s plea in abatement to the declaration. On October 24,1912, plaintiff filed a declaration against defendant in the circuit court for the county of St. Clair, on which was indorsed a rule to plead. A copy of this declaration, with notice of the rule to plead, was served on John J. Coryell, station and ticket agent at the Port Huron, Mich., station, a station along the line of the defendant railroad, on November 1, 1912. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heath v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Grady v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Simpson v. Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Cherry v. North & South RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago Railroad v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- U. S. Truck Co. v. Pennsylvania Surety Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Ihlan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Empire Refineries, Inc. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Kading v. WatersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.