Legal Opinion

Cherry v. North & South Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 15, 1877PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Corporations. Priucipal and agent. Service. Railroads. Before Mark EL Blandford, Esq., judge fro hao vice. Harris Superior Court. April Term, 1877. Report unnecessary.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

A certain person was the agent of a railroad corporation at a given station in Harris county, until the governor, by virtue of a provision in its charter, seized all its property for non-payment of interest on its bonds, which the state had indorsed. The-seizure took place April 23d, 1874, and *447the governor, in terms of the law, appointed a receiver. The receiver retained the same person to act as agent at the same station. Under this arrangement, the agent was required to give, and did give, a bond to the state for the faithful performance of his duties. . The corporation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Ocean Steamship Co. v. Wilder & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Chilletti ex rel. Chilletti v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Ennest v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API