Legal Opinion
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1969No. Calendar No. 15, Docket Nos. 51,726, 51,727PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
(for affirmance).
1. The Facts and Proceedings.
In November 1964, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company announced by public notification that effective January 3, 1965, it would discontinue oper*17ating passenger trains Nos. 14 and 15, running daily except Sunday between Grand Rapids and Detroit. These trains were one of three pairs of trains in which the railroad carried passengers on runs between those cities, the additional trains being designated as Nos. 11 and 12 and Nos. 19 and 20.
Train No. 11 was made up of a diesel locomotive, one mail car, one diner, two streamlined coaches and one…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Davis v. State Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Olkowski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- C. & OR CO. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001