Legal Opinion

Cisar v. Slyter

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 2012No. A11-303Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

This is an appeal from a summary judgment that dismissed appellants’ benefits *152claim as untimely. The district court ruled that because respondent Spring Vale Mutual Insurance Company is a township mutual fire insurance company, appellants’ insurance policy — issued by Spring Vale and specifying a one-year statute of limitations — is statutorily exempt from Minnesota insurance laws that require a two-year statute of limitations. Because we conclude that the portion of appellants’ insurance policy providing coverage for their dwelling constitutes homeowner’s insurance,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API