Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of B.N.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 9, 2002No. C2-01-1665PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellant B.N.S. contends that the district court erred as a matter of law by designating the prosecution against him an extended jurisdiction juvenile (EJJ) prosecution because respondent Martin County failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that an EJJ designation would serve public safety. Because the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that an EJJ designation would sérve the public safety in this case, we reverse.
FACTS
The Minnesota License Bureau in Fair-mont was burglarized on or about April 9 or 10, 2000, resulting in property…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Welfare of D.M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of B.J.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. J.E.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Nicholas Robert Schimmel v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. JESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009