Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of B.J.M.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 2001No. C1-01-376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to a juvenile-delinquency disposition order requiring appellant B.J.M. to pay restitution. B.J.M. argues that the juvenile court lost jurisdiction to impose the disposition because he turned age 19 before the adjudicatory and disposition hearings were held. B.J.M. argues that his failure to appear for the disposition hearing and for a hearing prior to the adjudicatory hearing did not justify extension of jurisdiction. We vacate the judgment.

FACTS

In March 1998, a petition was filed alleging that B.J.M. had committed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. BehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Matter of Welfare of G.(nmn) M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of B.N.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. A. B., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API