Legal Opinion

Homer v. Guzulaitis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1991No. 49A04-8904-CV-141PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellants Robert L. and Lynne K. Homer, husband and wife, (the Homers) brought a foreclosure action against defendant-appellees Rymantas and Shirley Guzu-laitis, husband and wife, Guzulaitis, Inc., and Arsenal Savings & Loan (collectively, the Guzulaitises). The Guzulaitises brought a counterclaim for fraud. The trial court denied all relief to the Homers and entered judgment for the Guzulaitises on their counterclaim.

The Homers raise several issues for our review, many of which concern the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. Accordingly, we have…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allen v. Great American Reserve Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Dearborn v. Everett J. Prescott, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
  5. Ashley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API