Legal Opinion
City of Norman v. Liddell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 19, 1979No. 51000PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
Defendants Liddell and Dickinson (owners) submitted plans to City Council of City of Norman (City) to subdivide and plat certain property in Norman, Oklahoma, for a mobile home park. City approved the plans contingent upon the construction of improvements in the subdivision, including the construction of sidewalks. In lieu of immediate actual completion of improvements, owners elected to file a surety bond pursuant to Norman ordinances.
On May 19, 1971, defendant American First Title and Trust Company (surety) executed the surety bond. The bond provided in part:
“NOW, THEREFORE,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge 1785 v. CavanessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Oklahoma Brick Corporation v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Vaughan v. John C. Winston Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- City of Enid v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Kimery v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.