Legal Opinion
City of Enid v. Champlin Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1925No. 15536PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH. C.
In this opinion the city of Enid will be designated as plaintiff, the Champlin Refining Company as defendant, and the board of county commissioners as the board.
Plaintiff’s petition alleges the county assessor fixed the valuation of defendant’s real estate for the year 1921 at $105,000, and the value of defendant’s, personal property at $379,730. That the county board of equalization fixed the value of defendant’s real estate at $85,000, and its personal property at $379,730, and this valuation was approved by the state board of equalization. That on February 6, 1922,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Gallup v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Contested Election of CusickLackawanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- City of Norman v. LiddellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Vaughan v. John C. Winston Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Miller v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.