Legal Opinion
Sielski v. Sielski
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 7, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
254 N.J. Super. 686 (1992)
604 A.2d 206
SUSAN SIELSKI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL SIELSKI, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Family Part, Hudson County.
January 7, 1992.
Susan Sielski for Plaintiff (Pro Se).
Michael Sielski for Defendant (Pro Se).
OPINION
HEALY, J.S.C.
This matter comes before the Court for a final hearing on the filing of a complaint pursuant to the provisions of the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1990.
The plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife but have been separated, and were living separate and apart at the time of the acts which gave rise to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Belinski v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Endress v. Brookdale Community CollegeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D.C. v. F.R.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Wine v. QuezadaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Reeves v. ReevesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Dc v. FrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- G.D. VS. U.D. (FV-12-1715-18, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021