Legal Opinion
Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 23, 1961PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
66 N.J. Super. 22 (1961)
168 A.2d 418
HELEN WINKLER AND HENRY C. WINKLER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 16, 1961.
Decided February 23, 1961.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and FULOP.
Mr. Walter L. Smith, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Armstrong & Geller, attorneys).
Mr. Michael Patrick King argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Spagnuolo v. BonnetSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Mueller v. Technical Devices Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Spiegel v. Evergreen Cemetery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Barber v. HohlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Cavuoti v. New Jersey Transit Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.