Legal Opinion

Berg v. Reaction Motors Division

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1962PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

The plaintiffs obtained a judgment against the defendant in the Law Division for compensatory and punitive damages. The defendant appealed and while its appeal was pending in the Appellate Division we certified it on our own motion.

The defendant had contracts with the United States for the development and production of the rocket engine for the X-15 supersonic airplane. The engine is designed for a maximum thrust of 50,000 pounds and 250,000 horsepower. The developmental stage of the engine required numerous tests and the critical testing…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API