Legal Opinion

D.C. v. F.R.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 23, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BAIME, J.A.D.

The Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991 (N.J.S.A 20:25-17 to -33) was designed to protect victims of domestic violence and to provide uniformity in prosecuting and adjudicating such claims. When the Act was originally adopted, it offered no protection to individuals subjected to violent acts by persons whom they had merely dated. In 1994, the Act was amended to cover victims of domestic violence who had engaged in a dating relationship with the offender. L.1994, c. 93, § 1. The *598principal question presented in tins case is whether…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Peper v. Princeton University Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cesare v. CesareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. J.F. v. B.K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Keil v. National Westminster Bank, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. A.B. v. L.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. R.L.U. v. J.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API