Legal Opinion

Naetzker v. Brocton Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.

Under an agreement entered between the parties, petitioners (Architects) were retained to provide administrative supervision of a building construction project being undertaken by appellant (School District). The agreement provided for arbitration of all questions in dispute arising under their contract. Following the award of the general construction contract in March, 1967, the Architects undertook their administrative supervision duties, including approval of roofing specifications submitted by the roofing subcontractor as well as periodic issuance of certificates for payment to be made to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Robins v. FinestoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Muller v. SturmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Central Trust Co. v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Lincoln Grain, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API