Legal Opinion

Olympic Steamship Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 31, 1958No. 3762PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDBERG, District Judge.

This is an action brought under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346 wherein it is alleged that the defendant sold and delivered to plaintiff the SS James A. Drain under the Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1735 et seq. The conveyance was accomplished by a bill of sale from the United States Maritime Commission to plaintiff dated April 30, 1947. On August 12, 1948 plaintiff paid the defendant $6,239.-66 for certain “special features” admittedly attached to the ship. It is a part of this payment which the plaintiff now seeks to recover, contending…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Little v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bacon v. WongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  2. Sprague Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  3. Bank One v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API