Legal Opinion

Sprague Steamship Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1959No. 401-57PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff in November, 1946 purchased from the United States Maritime Commission two dry cargo ships of the C2-S-Bl type, pursuant to the Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 41, 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 1735-1746. A considerable discussion of that statute may be found in this court’s opinion in A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 520.

In the instant case, as in the Bull case, the Maritime Commission, in computing the price which the plaintiff should pay for the ships, computed depreciation on the ships down to the “floor price” and then added to the floor price the cost…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knotts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. United States v. EdmonstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Nautilus Shipping Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Olympic Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rough Diamond Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Suwannee Steamship Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API