Legal Opinion

Bank One v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 31, 2003No. 01-325CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*475 OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

This case is an action by plaintiff to recover certain sums of money that defendant allegedly unlawfully exacted from the bank. Defendant claims these sums constitute a set-off of a debt owed by plaintiff. Defendant counterclaims for the remainder of the debt. The alleged debt is the result of certain checks the defendant contends were mistakenly proffered to the plaintiff. Plaintiff, in turn, maintains that the checks constitute an assignment of payments made by defendant to a contractor which, in turn, was alleged to be indebted to the bank. Before the court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Lawrence v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Taylor v. Federal Aviation AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API