Legal Opinion

Sheffield Merchandise, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 3, 1956No. 59884; protest 228514-K (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This case involves an importation of watches, which plaintiff claims were entered at incorrect values due to clerical error. Importation took place prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1953, *419T. D. 53318, during the period in which section 503 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 was in effect.

Under paragraph 367 of said tariff act, watchcases and movements are subject to different rates of duty, the cases being subject to an ad valorem rate and the movements subject to a specific rate. The record discloses that, in preparing the pro forma invoice, the values…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Igstaedter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. United States v. Frank & LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Loudon ex rel. Floyd v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Ringk & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. S. Jackson & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Berkery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API