Berkery, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Concurrence
CONCTTRRING OPINION
Johnson, Judge:
After independent research into the issues presented and the applicable authorities, the result of which is set forth below, I am in accord that the protest in this case must be dismissed.
The protest is directed against the collector’s assessment of duty on raffia fiber at 10 per centum ad valorem on the ground that “the liquidation on a value higher than the actual value of the merchandise constitutes a clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence within the meaning of Sec. 520(c) (1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.”
The facts appearing in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. Gothic Watch Co.United States Customs Court · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.