United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarbee, Judge
There is no appearance or brief in behalf of importer in this case.
The facts are meager. The invoice stated the merchandise to be 1,075 bushels of wheat, valued at $2.20 per bushel. The total value, however, was therein carried out or extended at $3,365, when in fact it should have been $2,365. The entry papers are not before us, but obviously the error in the invoice was reproduced in the entry, and the Government so assumes. The correct rate of duty on the importation was 10 per cent ad valorem.
On liquidation the collector regarded $3,365 as the entered value and apparently took duty of 10…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walden v. Bodley's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- United States v. Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Saxonville Mills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Mills v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- H. A. Gogarty Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- Kurz & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Frank P. Dow Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.