Legal Opinion

Loudon ex rel. Floyd v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 14, 1942No. 5731; Entry No. 1522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tilson, Judge:

This case is before us by reason of an application having been filed for a review of the decision of the trial court under the provisions of section 501 of the act of 1930. Before the trial court three appeals to reappraisement were involved, but an application for review was filed only as to reappraisement 135947-A. Therefore, we are here concerned with the decision of the trial court only as to one appeal.

The following is quoted from the decision of the trial court:

A different situation is encountered in connection with Reappraisement 135947-A. On the invoice covered by that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ringk & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. StegemannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Balfour v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. N. M. Albert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Wedemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  4. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. United States v. BaileyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API