Legal Opinion

Wilson Realty Co. v. City and County Planning Board

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1956No. 382PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The petitioner in its petition does not challenge the validity or constitutionality of the enabling act under which the City and County Planning Board was established, Chapter 677, Session Laws of 1947. The cause of action alleged in the petition presupposes a legally constituted planning board, created under a valid act of the General Assembly, with power to make discretionary decisions within the framework of the enabling act. Therefore we lay aside as not being pertinent to decision the contentions pro and con, discussed in the briefs and debated upon the argument, with reference to these…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Snow v. North Carolina Board of ArchitectureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NC, INC. v. City of ShelbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Batch v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. RouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API