Legal Opinion

Conner v. City of Raleigh

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided May 29, 1998No. I.C. Nos. 570501, 623800, 650687Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as:

STIPULATIONS

1. At all times in question, the City of Raleigh was self-insured.

2. (570501)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Vandiford v. Stewart Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API