Legal Opinion

Therrien v. Therrien

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 2, 1946No. 3575PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

In the absence of a contrary public policy or prohibitory legislation express or implied, it is the rule in this State that the expressed intention of the grantor will override, whenever possible, purely formalistic objections to real estate conveyancing based on shadowy, subtle and arbitrary distinctions and niceties of the feudal common law. Adequate support for this constructional rule from respected sources is not lacking. “It has been many years since the technicalities of real estate conveyancing have been much regarded here. Given an instrument signed and under seal, all the rest is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ames v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Boehringer v. SchmidNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Edge v. BarrowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re: Estate of Plance Appeal of: Plance, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Mamalis v. BornovasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. In Re Frolich EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Red Hill Outing Club v. HammondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Haynes v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API