Legal Opinion
Red Hill Outing Club v. Hammond
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 31, 1998No. 97-312PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendants, David and Elizabeth Hammond and their son, Robert Hammond, appeal the Superior Court’s (Fauver, *285J.) decision denying them right of re-entry and possession of land they deeded to the plaintiff, Red Hill Outing Club (club), subject to a condition subsequent. We affirm.
David Hammond purchased land in Moultonboro in 1956 known as Red Hill, which was subsequently cleared for use as a ski slope. Hammond installed a rope tow and participated in forming the club for the purpose of operating the ski slope. From 1969 to 1979, the club leased Red Hill. During this period, it operated the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Baker v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Griggs v. Driftwood Landing, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Smith v. FurbishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Estate of KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Webster v. ReganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Bursey v. BurseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- J. Albert Lynch v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.