Legal Opinion

Edge v. Barrow

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

After a final decree for the plaintiff upon a bill to remove a cloud from her title to land in Tyngsborough, the defendant appealed. At the hearing the facts were not in dispute. On July 1, 1920, Thomas H. Barrow, the father of the defendant, owning the land, granted it by a recorded deed “to Catherine S. Barrow, my wife, and to myself, to hold as tenants by the entirety and not as tenants in common.” Catherine S. Barrow therein released “to said grantees” all rights of dower and homestead. It is not suggested that the deed was not recorded during the lifetime of both spouses. Erickson v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franz v. FranzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Hoag v. HoagMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Splaine v. MorrisseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Childs v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Woodard v. WoodardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Therrien v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  3. Lipps v. CroweNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API