Boehringer v. Schmid
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Matter of Klatzl (216 N. Y. 83) must be regarded as conclusively holding that “ The creation of a tenancy by the entirety is permitted by law and a husband may by conveyance to himself and his wife create such a tenancy, thereby reserving to himself the same rights he would have under a deed from a third person.” Although Bartlett, Ch. J., concurred fin result only) in the opinion of Seabtjry, J., he said: “ * * * I see no reason why the husband could not convey to his wife such an estate as she would get by a similar deed to them from a third person, and at the same time reserve for himself…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stuehm v. MikulskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Therrien v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
- Cleaver v. LongLicking County Court of Common Pleas · 1955
- Cadgene v. CadgeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.