Legal Opinion

Boehringer v. Schmid

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Matter of Klatzl (216 N. Y. 83) must be regarded as conclusively holding that “ The creation of a tenancy by the entirety is permitted by law and a husband may by conveyance to himself and his wife create such a tenancy, thereby reserving to himself the same rights he would have under a deed from a third person.” Although Bartlett, Ch. J., concurred fin result only) in the opinion of Seabtjry, J., he said: “ * * * I see no reason why the husband could not convey to his wife such an estate as she would get by a similar deed to them from a third person, and at the same time reserve for himself…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stuehm v. MikulskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Therrien v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  4. Cleaver v. LongLicking County Court of Common Pleas · 1955
  5. Cadgene v. CadgeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API