Baggish v. Offengand
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action by the payee against the maker and the indorser of a promissory note, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Hinman, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff to recover pf the defendant indorser $6,273, and appeal by that defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.
This case was before this court on an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a non-suit. Baggish v. Offengand, 97 Conn. 312, 116 Atl. 614. In accordance with the mandate of this court, the cause was remanded and proceeded with as if no nonsuit had been granted. No change was made in the pleadings, which are fully stated in the report of the former appeal.
Upon this trial the court found all the issues in favor of the plaintiff. In its finding it states that the defendant Kaplan did not attempt to deny his signature on the note in suit in such a position as to render him liable to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baggish v. OffengandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Contino v. TurelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- American National Bank v. WoolardIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Kessler v. ValerioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Culberson v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- James Conforti Construction Co v. Neek Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.