Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Poor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1889No. 13,968PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— The appellant’s complaint is founded on i a promissory note which it is alleged was executed by the appellee to A. J. Selby, by Selby endorsed to Theodore Fields, and by the latter to the appellant before maturity and for value. The note is negotiable by the law merchant.

*136The third paragraph of the appellee’s answer admits that he signed the note, but avers that after it was signed it was altered without his knowledge or consent by inserting the figure “ 8 ” before the words “per cent, interest,” thus making it bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum, whereas as it was written,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. New v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Cline v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Schnewind v. HacketIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. McCoy v. LockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fudge v. MarquellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McCaslin v. Advance Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Matter of Estate of GloverHawaii Supreme Court · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API