Legal Opinion

Gooding v. . Pope

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.,

after stating tbe ease: Was it error for tbe court, after tbe jury bad retired to make up its verdict, to send to tbe jury room, on request of tbe jury and over objection of counsel for defendants, tbe papers offered in evidence by tbe defendants, together with tbe magnifying glass used on tbe trial? We think not under tbe facts of tbe present case.

Tbe practice at common law was against allowing tbe jury to examine tbe papers introduced in evidence, either during tbe trial or afterwards in tbe jury room. Newton v. Newton, 182 N. C., 54; Tunstall v. Cobb, 109 N. C., 321; Outlaw v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Outlaw v. . Hurdle and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  3. Alexander v. BlackburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Newton v. . NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LeDucSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Call v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Brown v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. In Re the Will of GatlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API