Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Gatling

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1951No. 455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The assignments of error presented by appellant on this appeal are based in the main upon exceptions, I, to the testimony of the handwriting expert introduced by the caveator, and, II, to portions of the charge. These will be considered in this order.

I. Propounder in his brief filed in this Court states that all of his exceptions to the testimony of the handwriting expert come down to these points : “1. His insistence upon personifying the writer as 'Mr. Gatling,’ describing his habits, and stating what 'Mr. Gatling’ or 'the writer’ would do or would not do.

“2. He insisted upon repeated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fourth National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Alexander v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Outlaw v. . Hurdle and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Tunstall v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Gooding v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. In Re the Will of AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API