Legal Opinion

Hurst/Van Dusen v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2020No. S067329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

260 On petitions to review ballot title filed January 7, considered and under advisement on February 25; ballot title referred to Attorney General for modification April 9, 2020 Tera HURST, Petitioner, v. Ellen F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. (SC S067329) (Control) Willis VAN DUSEN and Janet Steele, Petitioners, v. Ellen F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. (S067333)

461 P3d 978

The Attorney General certified a ballot title for Initiative Petition 50 (2020) (IP 50). Petitioners challenge the certified ballot title on the grounds that its cap-…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Novick/Crew v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. McCann / Harmon v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paden / von Schlegell v. Rayfield (S072772)Oregon Supreme Court · 2026
  2. Sasinowski v. Legislative AssemblyOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Trapp v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API