Legal Opinion

Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Gorham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Missaukee. (Aldrich, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This suit was brought in justice’s court upon the following promissory note:

“$72.12. Lake City, February 27, 1887.
“Nine months after date, I promise to pay to the Aultman & Taylor Company, or bearer, seventy-two & 12-100 dollars, at bank at Lake City, value received, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum.
“P. J. Gorham.
“F. L. Decker.”

The defendant Decker, upon the trial before the justice, pleaded the general issue, and gave notice as follows:

“1. That he joined as maker of said note declared upon in the cause as accommodation merely, and never had any interest in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gumz v. GieglingMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Sheffler v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Mason & Hamlin Co. v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rumsey v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API