Legal Opinion

State v. Stern

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1937No. 31,436PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 275 N.W. 626. Defendant, convicted of the offense of advertising a lottery on the 18th day of February, 1937, appeals.

The facts were stipulated and a jury waived, the charge being a misdemeanor. For a condensed statement of the facts material for a decision, this may suffice: Defendant is the principal owner and manager of a Minnesota corporation which was employed by Affiliated Distributors, an Iowa corporation, as agent for Affiliated Enterprises, a Colorado corporation, to solicit contracts from moving picture theatres to use a purported copyrighted plan called "bank night"…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Yellow-Stone Kit v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Little River Theatre Corp. v. State Ex Rel. HodgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Draper v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. State v. Schubert Theatre Players Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Territory v. SurHawaii Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API