People v. Bojorquez
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
In this case, we affirm defendant Frank Martin Bojorquez’s convictions of consensual sexual activity with a confined adult (Pen. Code, § 289.6, subd. (a)(2); all statutory references are to this code), based on his conduct while supervising community work release participants at a county animal shelter. For the reasons explained below, we reject defendant’s argument that the sexual activity did not occur in a “detention facility” within the meaning of section 289.6.
In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we conclude substantial evidence supports defendant’s convictions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BraxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. SinohuiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. HaskinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Governing Board of South Orange County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hale v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Wofford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re Jesse Barber On Habeas Corpus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. RuffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Goldman v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.