Legal Opinion

People v. Ruffin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 2011No. F060606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, Acting P. J.

Pursuant to a negotiated settlement, prison inmate Maurice Ruffin pled no contest to a sex offense with the understanding that the court was to determine later whether the law required him to register as a sex offender. On appeal, he challenges as a violation of his constitutional right to equal protection the court’s later order requiring him to register. We reverse.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On October 4, 2008, a correctional officer monitoring a California State Prison, Corcoran, visiting area saw a female visitor moving her head in Ruffin’s lap in an apparent act of oral…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Heckler v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Newland v. Board of GovernorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. BojorquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. Lee CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API