Legal Opinion
Wofford v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 2014No. D064633PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
After being convicted of drug-related offenses, Lavina Carol Wofford was sentenced under the realignment act (Realignment Act) 1 to serve a portion of her prison sentence released into the community under the mandatory supervision of the probation department. Among the many conditions of her mandatory supervision, Wofford is required to obtain the superior court’s consent before moving to another state. Apart from mandatory supervision requirements, a released offender who wants to transfer his or her supervision to another state must also obtain the approval of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doe v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hubble v. Bi-State Development AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. FandinolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- M.F. v. State of New York Executive Department DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Irvine v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- People v. BorynackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ramirez v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Ramirez v. Superior Court of Imperial Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017