Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Larkin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1997No. 940079; CA A91554PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Husband appeals a dissolution judgment that relieves wife of any obligation to pay child support and requires husband to pay indefinite spousal support. We remand for entry of a modified judgment and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

At the time of trial, the parties had been married for 18 years and had one child, age 15. Wife was 39 years old and employed as a medical assistant. The court found that her gross monthly income would soon increase to $1,593. Husband was 38 years old and employed as a residential construction superintendent. The court found that his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and PerlenfeinOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of RossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. In re the Marriage of HayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. In re the Marriage of WesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of NiethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. In re the Marriage of CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Garcia-Ascencio v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API