Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. 84-727; CA A74897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Mother appeals from an order modifying the child support provisions of a judgment of dissolution. On de novo review, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Mother, the custodial parent, first assigns error to the award of the tax exemption to father. She argues that the child support guidelines award the tax exemption to the custodial parent as a matter of law. Mother is wrong. OAR 137-50-330(2)(a)(I) states that it is presumed that the custodial parent will have the dependency exemption. However, the exemption can be awarded to the noncustodial parent if the tax consequences are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bates v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In re RanesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LarkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. In re the Marriage of RossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Matter of Marriage of WilleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. In re the Marriage of MalpassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Dority v. HillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API